Principles Governing Construction Contracts in Construction Projects and Establishing A Relationship Between Cost and Schedule

Authors

  • Hossein Nematian Jelodar * Department of Civil Engineering, Chalus Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7297-5109
  • Fazel Siasar Nejad Department of Civil Engineering, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48314/jcase.v1i2.38

Abstract

This research was done with the aim of identifying and ranking how to set up the commitment contract and legal measures of the owner and the investor for the construction and completion of the project on time. This research was a descriptive survey study with a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative). In this research, the statistical population of North are active experts in the field of construction and familiar with legal contracts, and 8 people were selected using the available method. The ranking and weighting of the identified criteria were done using the fuzzy method. In the next step, the best contract was selected among the existing contracts using the obtained weights. The results of the ranking of the criteria using the Swarafazi method showed insufficient management skills with a weight of 0.55 in the first place, delay by contractors with a weight of 0.35 in the second place, delay in confirming the completed work with a weight of 0.24 in the third place. Material price fluctuations with a weight of 0.15 were identified as the most influential factors in project delays and costs in the fourth place. In the next step, the best contract between the contractor and the employer was selected using the obtained weights, and the results showed that the A8 contract was the best.

Keywords:

Delay in project delivery, Cost of project implementation, Caucus, Multi-criteria decision making

References

  1. [1] Banihashemi, S. A., Khalilzadeh, M., Antucheviciene, J., & Šaparauskas, J. (2021). Trading off time–cost–quality in construction project scheduling problems with fuzzy SWARA–TOPSIS approach. Buildings, 11(9), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090387

  2. [2] Albtoush, A. M. F., Doh, S. I., Rahman, A. R. B. A., & Albtoush, J. A. A. (2020). Factors Effecting the Cost Management in Construction Projects. International journal of civil engineering and technology (IJCIET), 11(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.34218/ijciet.11.1.2020.011

  3. [3] Parchami Jalal, M., Nurzaei, I. E., & Seydalangi, F. S. (2023). An overview of the benefits and challenges of implementing integrated project delivery (ipd) contracts. 13th international civil engineering congress. Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1852930

  4. [4] Heidaryd Dahooie, J., Mohammadi, N., Vanaki, A., & Ghaffari, S. (2017). A hybrid approach for selecting appropriate technological forecasting technique. Journal of technology development management, 4(4), 163-194. (In Persian). https://doi.org/:10.22104/jtdm.2018.2270.1781

  5. [5] Amani, R. (2023). Delay analysis and its types of methods analysis. https://drclaim.ir/delay-analysis/

  6. [6] Heravi, G., & Mohammadian, M. (2021). Investigating cost overruns and delay in urban construction projects in Iran. International journal of construction management, 21(9), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1601394

  7. [7] Hossain, M. A., Raiymbekov, D., Nadeem, A., & Kim, J. R. (2022). Delay causes in Kazakhstan’s construction projects and remedial measures. International journal of construction management, 22(5), 801–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1647635

  8. [8] Issa, A., Bdair, R., & Abu-Eisheh, S. (2022). Assessment of compliance to planned cost and time for implemented municipal roads projects in Palestine. Ain shams engineering journal, 13(2), 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.005

  9. [9] Nguyen, D. T., Le-Hoai, L., Basenda Tarigan, P., & Tran, D. H. (2022). Tradeoff time cost quality in repetitive construction project using fuzzy logic approach and symbiotic organism search algorithm. Alexandria engineering journal, 61(2), 1499–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.058

  10. [10] Oluwajana, S. M., Ukoje, J. E., Okosun, S. E., & Aje, I. O. (2022). Factors Affecting Time and Cost Performance of Road Construction Projects in Nigeria. African journal of applied research, 8(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.03.2022.5

  11. [11] Shrivas, A., & Singla, H. K. (2022). Analysis of interaction among the factors affecting delay in construction projects using interpretive structural modelling approach. International journal of construction management, 22(8), 1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1728486

  12. [12] Kundu, G. (2020). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) methodology and its application in supply chain research. International journal of innovative technology and exploring engineering (IJITEE), 9(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.D1607.029420

  13. [13] Torfi, F., Zanjirani Farahani, R., & Rezapour, S. (2010). Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Applied soft computing, 10(2), 520–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.021

  14. [14] TUNG, C. H., Memon, S., & Javed, A. (2020). Better management (risk and change) through NEC contracts in Hong Kong. The 8th international conference on construction engineering and project management. https://B2n.ir/u44424

  15. [15] Banerjee, R. (2023). 8 common reasons for construction delays. https://www.kppblaw.com/top-reasons-for-construction-delays/

  16. [16] Lau, C., Wadu Mesthrige, J., Lam, P., & Javed, A. (2019). The challenges of adopting new engineering contract: a Hong Kong study. Engineering, construction and architectural management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0055

Published

2024-11-01

How to Cite

Nematian Jelodar, H., & Siasar Nejad, F. (2024). Principles Governing Construction Contracts in Construction Projects and Establishing A Relationship Between Cost and Schedule. Journal of Civil Aspects and Structural Engineering, 1(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.48314/jcase.v1i2.38

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.